Pricing
Pricing based on repository and organization scope, not developer seats.
Start with a trial, run a guided pilot, or scope an annual plan around the repositories where missing ownership, stale suppressions, and unverifiable exceptions create real operating risk.
14-day enterprise trial
Find the debt before another audit cycle preserves it.
Use a focused repo set to prove whether the first snapshots reveal owner gaps, stale suppressions, policy drift, and evidence worth operationalizing.
14-day trial
time-boxed evaluation
Send the first real snapshots and find out where ownership, suppression review, and policy evidence break first.
- Up to 10 repos
- 3 API tokens
- 100 snapshots per month
- Self-guided suppression debt review
Guided pilot
30 days
Leave with scoped production repos, snapshots uploaded, orphaned findings identified, and one leadership evidence readout.
- One-time Stripe checkout
- Repo scope planning
- Scanner snapshot setup
- Suppression and owner-gap readout
Team
per year
For a focused platform or product engineering group standardizing ownership and exception governance.
- Up to 50 repos
- OIDC/RBAC
- Slack/Jira accountability routing
- Signed evidence exports
Growth
per year
For multiple teams expanding continuous governance evidence across production Go repositories.
- Up to 200 repos
- Policy pack reviews
- OIDC group role sync
- Customer diligence exports
Enterprise
annual
For broader organizations and self-hosted requirements.
- Custom deployment model
- Guided governance rollout
- Security review support
- Enterprise scope planning
Guided pilot
A 30-day pilot should end with a rollout decision, not a vague demo recap.
The pilot is designed to prove whether Faultline turns real source-free snapshots into evidence your leaders and reviewers can use to defend accepted risk.
By day 30
You know whether this belongs in production.
If the first focused repo set does not reveal useful governance evidence, you should not expand. If it does, rollout has a concrete operating model for ownership, suppression review, and evidence export.
Find the continuity gaps your current tooling cannot prove away.
You may have findings, scanners, and tickets. Under scrutiny, that still may not prove governance continuity.